home | page down

January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December

Barbs & Wires

June/July 2002

cold war
credulity
dairymaid account
ecclesiastic history
Ernest Hemingway
Eucharist
Everett's Universe
even Aristotle had his moments
fact & fiction
the giveaway 
God?
inside out
I.Q. blues
it's there for everyone who can read
let's not misunderstand each other
our constitutional dilemma
shaken not stirred 
the 'Stone of Destiny'
the storybook
oh those were the days
a valid question

May 2002

eternal recurrence?
gunlobby
the human touch
a keen observation
the New Testament
opinions
papal encyclicals
these parochial obsession of ours
reflection on Marcion
worth a study
the scariest news of recent times

April 2002

his greatest fan
the highwayman
Mary's virginity
no such thing as empty space
not enchanted
sceptical about Einstein
that sums it up
theoretical science in ancient Rome

March 2002

archaeology
in His image
I'm not making this up
midlife
no joy with all that Freud
a paradox?
the Piggy & Kermit show
a public relations problem
torture box experiments

February 2002

buddhism
a fact to be considered
by their language ye shall know them
the paradox
our postmodern parochialism
"every author creates his own pedigree"
school prayer
thank you, but no, thanks!
free willie
"What would have been the looks of it?

 

that sums it up
"Man had always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins because he had achieved so much ... the wheel, New York, wars, and so on, whilst all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a good time. But conversely the dolphins believed themselves to be more intelligent than man for precisely the same reasons."
Douglas Adams (*1952)

 

Ernest Hemingway
... became the most famous writer of the century, but it was for everything except writing. He killed at least one each of every animal in Africa. He caught at least one each of every big fish in the sea. Hemingway's lethal exploits were written up in the new picture magazines Life and Look, with photographs taken on the site of the massacre. Often Hemingway contributed the pose himself. He didn't actually kill every bull in Spain, but he liked watching. He wrote a book about it. He used simple sentences. He said the simple life of the instincts was better than too much thought.

In 1959 Hemmingway was back in Spain to watch the bulls bite the dust. Or else he was out in the Gulf Stream killing fish. Or else he was in Africa killing animals again. Hemmingway was always killing something. He called it an appetite for life. Hemingway lived in Key West, in Cuba, and in all the world's best hotels, always talking about the good wine and the good food and the good season. But he no longer wrote good books, although the Nobel Prize followed one of his worst, The Old Man and the Sea.

In Africa, on the hunt for the few remaining animals he had not already killed, Hemingway had a plane crash and woke up to read his own obituaries. His next move was to have another plane crash. When he recovered from that one he went fishing. He could never have enough of killing living things. Finally he did it to himself, with a shotgun.
Clive James

 

our constitutional dilemma
A
: "The historian in me has a dim idea what the originators of the electoral college may have had in mind - seen in a context of horse drawn carriages and smoke signals as the fastest means of communication. But the election of the President of the United States is the election of the Union's head of state: he is everybody's president not just for the people in Milwaukee, Delaware, and Rhode Island. And if Missouri needs to speak for herself, she has her governor and local senate to do so. The President of the United States is my and every individual's president regardless how such individual may feel for his or her state. The electoral college has one and one purpose only, to elect the President, therefore it is obsolete and self-defeating in a time when the popular majority of all individuals can be known in the same night, even before closing the polls. In fact the elector's legal right to overrule the figures from his constituency is a slap in the face for everything democracy is standing for. The electoral college has the function and capacity to introduce bias in an affair where only the figures should count. So why do we continue to cling so tenaciously to this archaic institution? We don't go to work on horseback anymore!"

B: "Different people elect presidents for different reasons, so do different groups of people ... "

A: "... are you trying to tell me that the people in Tennessee have a different agenda when voting for a President than the people in California, hence you need the electors to put things right? Well, hard luck buddy, if the interest of the Californians is outweighing yours in sheer numbers, then there must be a reason for it, a reason which figures in the Union's gross annual income. Their interest simply deserves to enjoy the priority as mirrored in the majority figures."

B: "Hey! Just imagine the whole world would be one big happy family under one state with popular majority rule, then the two groups with the lowest income, the peasant populations in China and India would be the ones pulling the weight and totalling out every other voter group - is that really what you want?"

A: "Why, have they no right to be represented?"

B: "Sure, but do you really think their interests weigh as much as the exponentially more productive interests of some much smaller groups? And this is limiting the argument only to the economic aspect. We even don't go to the cultural ramifications. Popular democracy can get us into the strangest places, my friend ... ."
S.

 

dairymaid account
In 1995 a British politician discribed the most recent changes in our economy as turning the under-educated labour-force from needless but decently payed jobs into subsidised redundancies, meaning that this actually would reduce the costs for the taxpayer. But his facial expression and a sudden pause between two phrases was a dead giveaway for what this actually means in terms of human dignity and motivation. And the reasoning is actually wrong. Those people did not receive their income from taxes, but from redundant branches of obsolete industry which indeed meant smaler profit margins for the money lender. But their income still contributed to the most important factor of any economy: domestic purchasing power. The only legitimate fuel of any ecnomy. On the dole they contribute nothing. In other words, they are laid off for the interests of an other minority group, which has the financial muscle to force their fellow human beings into redundancy for no other reason but to increase their own profits. And they dare telling us, Marx is passé?
S.

 

I.Q. bluess
Darwin's fitness gym: survival of the sharpest. Which is not exactly survival of the smartest. Calling you bright refers to your I.Q., calling you sharp acknowledges your knack of making the best with what amount of brains you are endowed with. What makes uneasy, is the aspect to leave this beautiful world to the manipulators alone. Thinkers don't count.
S.

 

oh those were the days ...
When I still didn't know much about penises at the time I looked it up in a book appropriately called a "dick-tionary."
S.

 

cold war
... was a new concept and given the most recent developments in our blessed post-cold-war world, a successful concept. That it should lead to one side's "victory" was a flaw in the execution. It left behind a world which is clearly less manageable and less secure with numberless hot little wars flaring up everywhere.
S.

 

fact & fiction
"A strong imagination creates the event."
Montaigne (1533-1592)


even Aristotle had his moments
According to Aristotle we are no human being before the 40th day after birth. Incidentally that is the day when most babies learn to gratify their completely manipulated parents for their round the clock services with a little peel of laughter. There was more to the old schoolmaster than meets the eye. But also notice the cruel aspect of what makes us laugh.
S.

 

shaken, not stirred
Grown up in a world of films and TV commercials, we perceive things differently from the verbal continuum of previous ages, more fragmented: We live on clever phrases, often barely eloquent, on attitudes and posing.
S.

 

the storybook
All the influence the Bible actually had in shaping our civilization is due to the fact that it is a storybook. Stories are meat for the imagination. Starve the imagination from stories and suffer the consequences.
S.

 

the 'Stone of Destiny'
1998, the 'Stone of Destiny,' the coronation seat of Scottish kings, was returned to Scotland. With parades, gun salutes and everything. Later in the program a Scottish historian pointed out that there are no actual records for the removal of the stone to London. That in fact the stone, if ever there was any, never left the country. It may still lie in the fields at Edinburgh Castle where hundreds of slabs litter the lawns. But since one stone there looks like any other, nobody is quite sure which one is which. On top of everything it was revealed that the coronation stone was the one which Jacob took for his pillow, when he had that dream!!!!
S.

 

the giveaway
"Postmodernism" - speak of contradictions in terms. The people who coined the label hoped that nobody would notice the good old fashioned "syncretism" underneath. Of course being "syncretistic" has a slightly derogative connotation - it reminds the groove-snob too much of the Victorians and the Roman Empire - hey did you really think being "postmodern" is something new? Hello: déjà vu! The only difference is the latter day communication speed. Today we do in minutes what previously took years. And what is it all about? A mess of styles thrown together by confused minds in search for their style. Blah.
S.

 

a valid question
When the subject of "black holes" first comes up in physics classes, a frequently asked question is "If nothing can escape the event horizon because nothing can propagate faster than light, how does gravity get out of a black hole?" The question is still valid.
S.

 

inside out
In a very large black hole, say of a mass of one hundred million times that of our Sun, the conditions beyond but close to the event horizon would be very mild. The average density of matter within the horizon would be about that of air. At this moment, we could all be living inside a very large black hole (say of the size of the universe) without noticing anything amiss. In fact, when we look back in time to the end of the light-cone, i.e. towards the "Big Bang," we actually could be looking to the center of a black hole. For an observer located close to the even horizon, it would be impossible to tell the difference between real expansion and static increase of overall mass. But we would have to postulate an invisible and inaccessible environment outside of our Black Hole, which for us would be representing the entire universe.
S.

 

Everett's Universe
The waking have one common world, but the sleeping turn aside each into a world of his own.
Heraclit (c.535-c.475)

 

credulity
"People will believe anything. Except, it seems, the truth."
Jeanette Winterson

 

ecclesiastic history
No mater how far back we track a document, the church or a church-like organization is already there as custodian of the tradition. From this I conclude we would be misguided to look for the beginnings of a new cult. Instead what we are after is the moment when the new sectarian movement splits off from an older mother religion; in other words we look for "heresy."
S.

 

it's there for everyone who can read
Does it actually bother nobody that the early outbreaks of hysterical sightings of the resurrected (Mark 9:2-10; Jn. 20:2, 10; Acts 2:14-36) used to happen in the presence of people who simply saw nothing - just a bunch of seemingly raving lunies and drunks? Even Peter himself admits that much.
S.

 

God?
"God wouldn't be popular with you, if the natural atheist in you wouldn't be panicking."
Edmund White (*1940)

 

let's not misunderstand each other
Whoever thinks that any system of social security could ultimately dry all the tears, or that science has the answer to everything, is sorely mistaken. Science is a specific methodology for the acquisition of knowledge, in fact the only methodology that works. It does give us the truth. Euclid's 'Elements' had for two thousand years been the only book of indisputable truth on the planet. But I doubt that during this time anybody on his deathbed had been able to draw comfort from the fact that the sum of all angles in a triangle makes two right angles. There is a sadness oozing from "the velvet at the bottom of all things," and I am not sure that rationalism has taught us to face it squarely. (The nowadays common mix-up of 'tragedy' with merely sad and sentimental stories is a telling sign; the loss of the sense for the tragic and the whole complex of values and insights surrounding it, has consequences. It de-humanizes.) That is why the religious rabble with their false promises is still able to be crowding the door. Rationalism has failed us because in order to save a precarious status quo in the division between church and state, it left religion with the monopoly to address the issue of consolation and comfort. But no matter how outmoded the religious legacy appears to be - coming from the early bronze age and handed down to us through dynasties of priests, shamans, and charlatans - we cannot afford not to address their issues. The failure to do so has in recent history led to consequences no less brutal than the history of religious (especially Christian and Islamic) terror over the believing mind and the infidel's body.
S.

 

Eucharist
Real canibals may have an excuse for their diet; for ritual canibalism I know none.
S.

 

the New Testament
"It is amazing that God learned Greek to speak to the human race. Even more amazing is that he did not learn it better."
Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900)

 

papal encyclicals
As ever - the Catholic enthusiasm for thought prohibitions never fails.
S.

 

the human touch
"Man is certainly stark mad; he cannot make a worm, yet he will make gods by the dozen."
Michel de Montaigne (1533-1592)

 

reflection on an ancient heretic
If Satan incarnate came to visit us, how do you think he would introduce himself - as "Satan," or as "Christ?"
S.

 

worth a study
In the Egyptian pantheon the sinister Seth was the spirit of darkness and cruelty as opposed to Hathor, the goddess of beauty and merriment. Could it be, the Yahweh of the fugitive Hebrews, if he wasn't merely the genie or familiar spirit, from Jethro's hearth fire (Exodus 3:1) was actually an incognito for Seth? And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live (Ex. 33:20); and it came to pass by the way in the inn, that the LORD met Moses, and sought to kill him (Ex. 4:24); and Jacob was left alone; and there wrestled a man with him until the breaking of the day (Gen. 32:24).
S.

 

the scariest news I've heard recently
The law in Pakistan makes going to school mandatory. Isn't that so everywhere? Not quite! In Pakistan the country doesn't spend a penny on their schools. Therefore a large proportion of the children, who incidentally come mostly from the poorest and disenfranchised, observe the law by going to Koran schools, so called Medreses, where they literally learn nothing but the Koran. Rarely has a beneficial law been perverted to such extreme degree. And such country is a nuclear power! Can you imagine what this may mean, one day?
S.

opinions
Dogs have fleas, people have opinions.
S.

 

gunlobby
In 1914 a pistol-shot ignited the great European war, today it is the Balkans stretching all over the globe and Charlton Heston promoting the proliferation of handguns. I always thought he was a decent guy. I was wrong.
S.

 

eternal recurrence?
"
That it will never come again
Is what makes life so sweet"
Emily Dickinson (1830-1886)

 

a keen observation
"It is strange to observe that the most effective use of Scripture phraseology arises out of the application of it in a sense not intended by the author."
Benjamin Jowett (1817-1893)

 

these parochial obsessions of ours
Translators are so obsessed with getting right the Texan crease in their jeans (nobody wants to be all-American anymore) that they completely forget that there is more to communication than local flavors and cute soundbites. Literature is not a cooking show.
S.

 

his greatest fan
Dr. Goebbels saw to it that every German soldier carried in his backpack a copy of Hamsun's Nobel piece, the "Growth of the Soil." Basically the book is a well written manifesto of blood and soil for the radical right - Hamsun was not messing about and in Germany many lesser talents imitated the artfully retarded diction. Then came 1945, and Hamsun's imitators under the cover of anonymity turned to writing children's books. Imagine that!
S.

 

theoretical science in ancient Rome
My own fascination with Rome does not cloud my awareness that imperial Rome's political success had effectively put a stop to the progress of theoretical science. During the Hellenistic era, after Alexander's death, the sciences were thriving. Before Christianity became state-religion, we know of no official pressure or infringement; only of official neglect. But the scientific genius of the period had already migrated from free research into engineering and architecture. It would be interesting to identify the cultural factor that had had such negative effect. Was it lack of public funding after the death of the last scion of the Ptolemys (Cleopatra)? The absence of a system of public schools? The narrow-minded inertia of the ancient stock exchange? You tell me.
S.

 

no such thing as empty space, Mr. Newton
"
I don't say that matter and space are the same thing. I only say, there is not space, where there is no matter; and that space in itself is not an absolute reality."
Gottfried Leibnitz (1646­1716: in a letter responding to Newton's idea of the reality of an absolute space that is independent of the existence of matter.)

 

the highwayman
Mohammed, according to his Arabic biographers, spent a critical time of his life waylaying caravans and poisoning wells - which in a land of desert people for every lesser mortal would have been an unspeakable crime. Since it was a "holy war" and it was left to the victorious to write its history, nobody blinks an eye.
S.

 

not enchanted
I must admit, I have read the Koran only once in translation and I was struck by the monotony of an "endless and incoherent rhapsody of fable and precept." But then, I don't read Arabic. The Koran as imaginative literature, has little to redeem it. Except for a suggestion which is even not part of the book itself: One day Al-Buraq, the Prophet's magical horse, carried Mohammed to heaven, and on its departure toppled a water jar. The travel lasted a whole week, but on the prophet's return the still listing jar just hit the ground and spilled the first drops. (In Einstein's universe clocks traveling close to light velocity go infinitely slow, while clocks on earth continue calling standard time.)
S.

 

Mary's virginity
We know that the prophet suited his revelations to exigencies of policy and passions, and subsequently amplified the scripture to abrogate previous contradictions. Mohammed's companions recorded his utterances on palm-leaves and the shoulder bones of mutton. These recordings were cast into a domestic chest in the custody of one of his wives. Two years after Mohammed's death, Abubeker collected the text and the Caliph Othman revised the work in the 30th year of the Hegira. And if Gibbon is to believed, the Catholic Church appropriated the doctrine of Mary's virginity from the Koran.
S.

 

sceptical about Einstein
These days, physicists build their calculations around "four dimensional spacetime." But we know for sure, that space, real space, still has no more than three directions. And time is intimately linked to the emission and consumption of energy and Clausius' second law. If there really would be such a thing as a continuum of space and time in four dimensions, the actual value of Newton's gravity constant would be different and produce a universe in which the bodies roll apart and bounce about like balls on a billiard table. (However there wouldn't be sizable bodies in the first place: a spatially four dimensional Universe doesn't contain matter as we know it.) In fact latest astronomical triangulations show, there is even not much of a curvature out there - triangles in interstellar and intergalactic space measure up close to the usual 180° on a flat surface. How boring.
S.

 

midlife
"Once a man passes into his 40s, he has become a certified rogue!"
Chinese proverb

 

a paradox?

"War is the father of all and the king of all; ... Homer was wrong in saying: "Would that strife might perish from among gods and humans!" He did not see that he was praying for the destruction of the universe; for, if his prayer were heard, all things would pass away" (Heraclit c.535-c.475).

True: these days many more heart patients survive their first heart attack because of the emergency techniques developed in the Vietnam War. It is mathematically inevitable, that the number of rescued heart patients will outgrow the number of casualties from that war.
S.

 

archaeology
Archaeologists from a distant future - say, two millennia from now - should easily be able to date our skeletal remains. For instance, I was born when the world powers were testing hydrogen bombs in our atmosphere; so every bone from that period contains deposits of strontium, a fallout product of nuclear explosions. (Proudly shall I wear this batch from the dawn of the nuclear age.) Younger people, born in the seventies and later, will be recognizable by their dentures - there have been significant advances in dental care. (My childhood was still surrounded by black spotted teeth and gaps in the incisors.) Other clues are provided by new materials in hip-replacements.
S.

 

torture box experiments
Remember? They picked up the odd bystander from the street and asked to push buttons on an impressive setup of flashing lights and curved scales. It was introduced as part of a "pedagogic experiment." For all appearances it seemed to apply electric shocks to a person in the next room (partly visible through a glass panel) who apparently writhed in pain. The people at the button were decent blokes and lasses like you and me; housewives and insurance brokers. A man in a white smock gave instructions with an air of dignified authority. What he didn't tell, was, that the wired up guinea-pig behind the glass-panel was a student from acting school. Some hesitated, but barely anybody refused to "increase" the voltage, despite of heartrending screams from the other room, for effect amplified on the intercom speaker. The experiment confirmed that most people want to be told what to do. Even battle hardened conquistadors used to ask for absolution after a massacre and for indulgences before. There is wickedness in human nature, but this doesn't change the fact that a catalyst is needed to set it in motion.
S.

 

a public relations problem
The Renaissance had improved the Church's image but not the attitude. The Holy Office's responded to the printing press with the infamous index of forbidden books; Bruno attended his own barbecue as the main course and Galilei was presented with a pair of thumbscrews.
S.

 

no joy with all that Freud
Children of the 60s would have had no difficulties to identify Freud as a "guru." Basically that's what Freud had been. He doped his clients with cocaine into hysteria and exorcised hysteria as a profitable neurosis. For the record: in his entire lifetime, despite of claims, Freud did not cure even one single patient - including the "Wolfman." But he created an industry.
S.

 

I'm not making this up
President Kennedy and President Lincoln were elected to Congress in '46 of their respective centuries. Both were elected President in '60. Both had the legality of their elections contested. Both were directly involved with black civil rights. Both lost a son while serving as President. Both were killed while serving as President. Lincoln's staffer, whose name was Kennedy, advised him not to go to the theater. Kennedy's secretary, whose name was Lincoln, advised him not to go to Dallas. A week before Lincoln was shot, he was in Monroe, Maryland. A week before Kennedy was shot, he was with Marilyn Monroe. Both were shot on a Friday.  Both were shot in the head from behind. Both were shot in the presence of their wives. Both were shot while sitting with another couple. Both were shot with another member of their entourage being injured, but not fatally. Both assassins were born in '39. Both were Southerners favoring extremist views. Both are known by their first, middle and last names. Booth ran from the theater and was captured in a warehouse. Oswald ran from the warehouse and was captured in a theater. Both were themselves assassinated before their trials. Both President's successors were Southern Democrats. (How so? Did Lincoln choose a running mate from the other party?) Both successors had the last name of Johnson.  Both successors were Vice-Presidents. Both successors were born in '08. Both successors were former senators.
S.

 

the Piggy & Kermit show
I was already beyond that age where one could claim to have "grown up" with Sesame Street. But I still like Kermit - he would have made a good president. However, I sometimes wonder about the damage done by Sesame Street to groom the budding reader and prepare him for poetry? From that perspective, most adults will look back with embarrassment and swear never again to open a poetry book. Or is this too a generation thing?
S.

 

in His image
He had made the sinner and fornicator in His image - what does this tell us about the creator?
S.

 

our postmodern parochialism
Recently I had a friendly banter with a reviewer who had posted on his website a list of the ten "greatest cultural figures" of the 20th century. I couldn't believe my eyes! Was this for real? I mean we all are entitled to our little hobbies, and everybody knows that culture reveals itself in the difference how people do things. But it still boggles the mind to find on this list a certain Brian Lamb (who is that? never heard of him) George Orwell, John Wayne (huh?), Elvis (??? if at least he had chosen Louis Armstrong), Barry Goldwater?????!!?, and of course the inevitable Ronald Reagan. Apparently Albert Einstein, Max Planck, Alan Turing, W. H. Auden, James D. Watson & Francis Crick, the Monty Pythons, or even Henry J. Kaiser and Eisenhower are just not corny enough. Go figure.
S.

Brian P. Lamb helped found C-SPAN--the Cable-Satellite Public Affairs Network--and has served as the company's chief executive officer since its beginnings.The concept of a public affairs network that provides in-depth coverage of national and international issues was a natural for Lamb, who has been both a journalist and a political press secretary. Interested in broadcasting from childhood, he worked at Indiana radio and television stations while attending high school and college, spinning records, selling ads, and eventually hosting the locally popular Dance Date television program.After graduation from Purdue University, Lamb joined the Navy; his tour included White House duty and a stint in the Pentagon public affairs office. In 1967, he went home to Lafayette, Ind., and its local television station. Washington beckoned, however, and he soon returned to the nation's capital. There, he worked as a freelance reporter for UPI Audio, a Senate press secretary, and a White House telecommunications policy staffer. In 1974, Lamb began publishing a biweekly newsletter called The Media Report. He also covered communications issues as Washington bureau chief for CableVision magazine. It was from this vantage point that the idea of a public affairs network delivered by satellite began to take shape. By 1977, Lamb won the support of key cable industry executives for a channel that could deliver gavel-to-gavel coverage of the U.S. Congress. Organizing C-SPAN as a not-for-profit comapny, the group built one of Washington, D.C.'s first satellite uplinks by March 1979--just in time to deliver the first televised session of the U.S. House of Representatives to 3.5 million cable households. With cable industry support, C-SPAN grew rapidly from a part-time video programming service. Today's C-SPAN employs 244 people and offers two 24-hour video channels--C-SPAN and C-SPAN 2, plus a 50,000-watt radio station--WCSP-FM--which serves the Washington/Baltimore area. Still best known for live, gavel-to-gavel coverage of the U.S. Congress, each C-SPAN service also provides unique public affairs programming on a wide range of news and public policy issues. More than 75 million households may tune into C-SPAN's flagship network. Also one of C-SPAN's on-air hosts, Lamb lives in Arlington, Va.)

 

what would it have looked like?
W
.: "Tell me, why do people always say it was natural to assume that the sun went around the earth rather than having the earth rotating around the sun?" - B.: "Well obviously, because by the looks of it, the sun is going around the earth." - W.: "Then tell me, what would have been the looks of an earth that rotates around the sun?"
Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951)

 

a fact to be considered
Of the five greatest geniuses of the western world - Plato, Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, Shakespeare, Albert Einstein - three had been gay, one was ambiguous, and only one positively straight.
S.

 

thank you, but no, thanks
A Discourse on Inequality, by Jean-Jacques Rousseau
"I have received your new book against the human race, and thank you for it. Never was such cleverness used in the design of making us all stupid. One longs, in reading your book, to walk on all fours. But as I have lost that habit for more than sixty years, I feel unhappily the impossibility of resuming it. Nor can I embark in search of the savages of Canada, because the maladies to which I am condemned render a European surgeon necessary to me; because war is going on in those regions; and because the example of our actions has made the savages nearly as bad as ourselves."
Voltaire (1755)

 

buddhism
A friend of mine said that meditation introduces happiness among Buddhist monks. It is "good dope," inexpensive and with no bad side-effects. Some monks may even maintain that "jhana" is better than sex, because it goes on for hours and "frees the mind from attachments." Well, I too had my Zen-phase during adolescence, and I knew all about the Japanese swordsmen who honed their skills and dulled their minds in meditation; but seriously: Why should I want to be dissociated from my attachments? That's what makes me the person I am; it gives meaning to my life; it is the stuff that matters. Yes, it can cause pain and is the occasional source of unhappiness - well that's the price for being alive. But systematically vegetating and withdrawing, if nothing else, is a waste of the one shot on life we have and pretty boring, isn't it?
S.

 

the paradox
The signatories of the American Constitution swore by the principle of tolerance and the separation of State and Church - but the paradox is still with us! How can tolerance survive if it includes its worst enemies? Because if tolerance would make exceptions, it would no longer be tolerance - right?
S.

 

free willie
(I'm waxwork in my Willie's hands ... .) Which begs the question: First: is it one Willie, or many, or everyone's? Second: is it a real Willie, unreal or a counterfactual superposition? Thirdly: is a superposition something implied or sub-sequential? Consequential or dependent? And: Is it actually possible at all? Does Willie exist? Must he be or can he be? And if he can, why should he? Says at my ear a sleepy voice - "but we are free to choose?"
S.

 

school prayer
"And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, they have their reward. But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret."
Matthew 6:5-6

 

"every author creates his own pedigree." (Jorge Luis Borges)
Dostoyevsky looked for his models at Eugène Sue, Byron, Ann Radcliffe, Jean-Jaques Rousseau, and Samuel Richardson. Why? Because they educated their audience in the pleasures of the simple life of the poor (but secretly disposed of their own children in the orphanages) and made it a trade, to exaggerate emotions to a point that it provokes a Pavlovian reflex of conventional compassion. Even the great Charles Dickens, with a very conscious look at sales-figures, would do such a thing.
S.

 

by their language ye shall know them
"It is perfectly clear to me, that Nietzsche was quite mad and not just in a figurative sense: his incoherence, the leaps between thoughts, comparisons without telling what he is comparing, the way he starts a rodomontade without bringing it to an end - - this positively demented obsession with his own brilliant superiority!"
Tolstoy (1828-1910)

 

 

[A] [B] [C] [D] [E] [F] [G] [H] [I] [J] [K] [L] [M] [N] [O] [P] [Q] [R] [S] [T] [U] [V] [W] [X] [Y] [Z]

home | what's new | reviews | features | previews | b.& w. | Dawn's page | mailbox | index | links | small print

fiction | poetry | criticism | biography | history | philosophy | cosmology| chronology | archive

Copyright © - 1/1/2002 - michael sympson - all rights reserved

page up